Blog

Does Technology Make Less Motivated Students?

21 Feb 2014 | Under Technology | Posted by | 1 Comment
Banner: Does Technology Make Less Motivated Students?

A fascinating debate mentioned by Larry Cuban and first published in edSurge discusses a philosophical schism in implementing educational technology. While this particular debate is rooted in behavior modification of relatively young students using an app called ClassDojo, it poses a powerful question: Does technology make less motivated students? Are technology-rich lesson plans leading our students to be driven by bright lights and flashy buttons and not by the love of learning? As an educational technologist and teacher, I found myself diving into this discussion with relish.

Motives are reasons people hold for initiation and performing voluntary behavior. They indicate the meaning of human behavior, and they may reveal a person’s values. Motives often affect a person’s perception, cognition, emotion, and behavior.
(Steven Reiss, Ohio State University)

ClassDojo Debate

In the edSurge article, “When Classroom Culture Conflicts With EdTech”, Karen Lirenman explains why she will not try ClassDojo in her first grade class. Her case is followed by Erin Klein’s success story with the app in her second grade class. The debate is well-structured: By presenting Lireman’s concerns first, I found I was trying to punch holes in Klein’s successes to see if they were superficial.

Lirenman’s most compelling point is quoted below. She argues that the performance goals created by ClassDojo could encourage better behavior but for the wrong reasons. Students won’t learn how to control themselves any better. Instead, they’ll manipulate a system to get prizes while gaining no deeper skills. Compliance with the classroom culture isn’t enough. Students need guidance to become independent, curious learners, and luring them with colorful cartoon characters isn’t the answer.

ClassDojo seems to enforce external rewards. And no matter how you jazz it up, external rewards don’t work in the long run. Yes, you may see results in the short term, but what happens when you remove the reward? From what I’ve seen, there is little authenticity and ownership of that said action. Using ClassDojo would make it hard for students to self regulate.
(Karen Lirenman, “When Classroom Culture Conflicts with EdTech”)

Intrinsic VS Extrinsic Motivation

Intrinsic motivation means you’re interested in completing a task because the process is rewarding in itself. Extrinsic motivation means you’re interested in completing a task for the reward that someone or something will give you. So when we ask, “Does technology make less motivated students?” what we’re really saying is, “Does technology make less intrinsically motivated students?”

Gamification

If you haven’t watched the TED Talk about building a “game layer” to the world, I would recommend checking it out below. As you watch, consider how offering incentives to modify behavior might change the purpose and intent of an action. Does offering a “Happy Hour” special at a bar, for example, shift your intrinsic motivation of enjoying a social meeting to getting a discounted libation?

ARCS Motivation Model

The ARCS Motivation Model (Keller, 1984) will let us delve into intrinsic motivation with more specificity and shed some light on the question, “Does technology make less motivated students?” The model parses motivation into four detailed aspects. Just reading over this list, I can see many ways technology can serve as both a supporting and detracting factor.

Attention

    • Perceptual Arousal: What can I do to capture their interest?
    • Inquiry Arousal: How can I stimulate an attitude of inquiry?
    • Variability: How can I maintain their attention?

Relevance

    • Goal Orientation: How can I best meet my learner’s needs?
    • Motive Matching: How and when can I provide my learners with appropriate choices, responsibilities and influence?
    • Familiarity: How can I tie the instruction to the learners’ experiences?

Confidence

    • Learning Requirements: How can I assist in building a positive expectation for success?
    • Success Opportunities: How will the learning experience support or enhance the students’ beliefs in their competence?
    • Personal Control: How will the learners clearly know their success is based upon their efforts and abilities?

Satisfaction

    • Natural Consequences: How can I provide meaningful opportunities for learners to use their newly acquired knowledge/skill?
    • Positive Consequences: What will provide reinforcement to the learners’ successes?
    • Equity: How can I assist the students in anchoring a positive feeling about their accomplishments?

The qualities of intrinsic motivation are not in conflict with the broad concept of Technology. Especially as edtech becomes increasingly common in our daily routines, its presence is insignificant compared to its application. Even with a particular app, one must look at a case-by-case basis to evaluate the components of attention, relevance, confidence and satisfaction.

Does Technology Make Less Motivated Students?

If implemented poorly, yes it can. But with attention to the ARCS Model and adherence to some fairly common-sense best practices, educational technology can serve as vital scaffolding as well as a playground to foster intrinsic motivation. Erin Klein said it best in her half of the ClassDojo debate, “I found, it’s not about the tool itself, but how the tool is used.”

Dan Adiletta

About Dan Adiletta

Daniel Adiletta is a licensed teacher with experience implementing 1:1 programs. While guiding an iPad initiative and teaching Computer Science, Adiletta went through numerous response systems until he found ExitTicket. It was exactly what he was looking for and he told his colleagues about it via YouTube. Now he's a part of the ExitTicket team.

Today, I ran a professional development my teaching staff at Allen Park High School. It went great. Before today, I have 8 teachers who are using it. After today, the number will definitely increase.

timbrown
Tim Brown, Mathematics Department Chair
Allen Park High School

ExitTicket has been designed how education technology should be designed: In the classroom, by teachers and students.

Refsland_2010
Scot Refsland, Ph.D.
LPS Innovation Fellow

We designed and built ExitTicket with the purpose of giving teachers a powerful tool to accelerate student learning – particularly for students entering significantly below grade level.

Louise Waters
Dr Louise Waters, CEO, Superintendent
Leadership Public Schools

Great app to be a more responsive teacher, save time grading, and have students celebrate growth

mmosbey
Mitch Mosbey, First Grade
Promise Road Elementary

Looking for a way to track and monitor student progress? Use ExitTicket student response system for beautiful management!

lhudak
Lindsay Hudak, Edtech Integration Specialist
Tri-Creek School Corp.

Your app has helped me teach my students how having ‘grit’ leads to success

iengagedeacher
Kristin Thomsen, 6th Grade Teacher

I saw ExitTicket when it was just barely a functional prototype two years ago. Now seeing it in action recently at the Education For the Future’s Summer Institute, Wow! It’s a real game changer.

Marcy
Marcy Lauck, Director, National Data Strategies, NLET

I am very enthusiastic about ExitTicket because it fills a much needed gap in our education reform efforts.

tom-vander-ark
Tom Vander Ark, CEO of Getting Smart

I’ve seen a lot of technology over the years, and ExitTicket is one of the most impactful educational tools I’ve ever seen.

timKoogle
Tim Koogle, Former CEO of Yahoo

I’m a huge ExitTicket fan.

jamessanders
James Sanders, White House Fellow

The power of change it produces in both students and teachers is amazing. The way it handles detailed longitudinal data has never been seen before in a student response system.

BernhardtWeb
Vickie Bernhardt, Director, Education for the Future